Sixties cult Westerns
Hellman
Nicholson in '66
I say low-budget: they were made for
$70,000 each – peanuts, even in those days. And $10,000 of that is said to have gone to the
horse wranglers, the only unionized labor on the set. But that doesn’t mean
they are low quality. The actors may not have been (at that time) top stars but
they were pretty good. The writing, by Nicholson for Whirlwind and by
Carole Eastman as Adrien Joyce on The Shooting, was
modernistic, thoughtful and natural (both writers had an ear for Western
vernacular), with the dialogue in the latter being more opaque. Nicholson had
been reading frontier diaries in the LA library and aimed for an authentic feel
and atmosphere. Whirlwind
is probably the more traditional in plot and staging, while The Shooting is
more abstract, with a fatalism Camus would have appreciated (Hellman was a
great reader of Albert).
Ride in the Whirlwind opens with a stage hold-up, though without the usual Western chase and pzazz. The coach is moving at little more than walking pace, there are only two passengers and everyone is somnolent. The robbers are not very competent and they get a pittance in loot. One of them is hit and they kill the shotgun messenger.
Then we meet three honest cowboys, riding home to Texas, Wes (Nicholson) Vern (the excellent Cameron Mitchell) and Otis (writer and lobster-diver Tom Giler, chronicler of the South California writers set). They pass a hanging corpse of a man and it darkens their mood, understandably.
Ride in the Whirlwind opens with a stage hold-up, though without the usual Western chase and pzazz. The coach is moving at little more than walking pace, there are only two passengers and everyone is somnolent. The robbers are not very competent and they get a pittance in loot. One of them is hit and they kill the shotgun messenger.
Then we meet three honest cowboys, riding home to Texas, Wes (Nicholson) Vern (the excellent Cameron Mitchell) and Otis (writer and lobster-diver Tom Giler, chronicler of the South California writers set). They pass a hanging corpse of a man and it darkens their mood, understandably.
The mood darkens
They rest up at the ramshackle cabin of some dirty men, whom we
know to be the outlaws. The cowboys are suspicious of the ragged crew but the
eye-patched leader, Blind Dick, played by Dean Stanton (as he was billed then)
is hospitable and inviting, so they stay overnight. Mistake.
Harry Dean is the outlaw boss
Early the next morning a posse of
vigilantes, anxious to lynch the robbers, comes up, assumes that the three
drovers are part of the gang and starts blazing away in the way that lynching
vigilantes are wont to do. One of the trio is killed and the other two make it
away while the vigilantes are stringing up what remains of the gang, but the
pair find themselves in a box canyon. It is hard to evade pursuit but they just
manage.
Cameron was never less than excellent in Westerns
It is only now, 44 minutes in, that we
meet the second-billed star, Millie Perkins (who had been Anne Frank in the
1959 George Stevens-directed movie and was a neighbor of Hellman's) as Abigail, the daughter of a couple of
homesteaders (George Mitchell and Katherine Squire). This is because the two
cowpokes, on foot, fetch up at the farm and seek shelter, food and rest. Pretty well the only false note Hellman struck was to have Perkins in 60s false eyelashes.
Hellman and Nicholson spend some time
depicting the drudgery and crushing routine of frontier farming life, symbolized
by Mitchell endlessly axing a Shane-like
stump in the yard. But the cowboys are polite, respectful and unthreatening,
even if they do impose their presence on the family. In this way the situation
is the polar opposite of that in a modern Western I have just reviewed, Outlaws and Angels. Still, the cowboys
need the farmer’s horses to get away on. This will leave the man destitute and he will not stand for it.
There will be blood.
Wes is consoled for the loss of their pard
The dominant colors of the picture are
brown and gray-orange, with dun and tan costumes against a Utah backdrop. This
somehow heightens the somber and intense atmosphere. I can’t remember any
character smiling. There is no spectacular adventure here, no flashy showdown, no wide open spaces
of the West; it’s not a traditional Western in that way. There are no superman
heroes or truly evil badmen.
I watched these two movies again the other
day, in order to write about them here, and I must say they were better than I
remembered.
Good Article. Website
ReplyDeleteThankee kindly.
DeleteJeff
I remember having seen both films in Paris in the mid sixties. I still like both of them, especially Whirlwind, less abstract or let say intellectual - and I am French you know... - than Shooting. Its low key minimalist plot paired with a gorgeous photo and splendid Kanab region, and its efforts for authenticity are giving an humble masterpiece. Nicholson - he was not 30 years old yet ! - is showing very little of his further tics - no lancasterish smile at all, no rolling eyes... -and the violence is more in the weight of the fate than the gunnery's effects, and this only one year before Bonnie and Clyde which will bring a new marker along with the spaghettis. JM
ReplyDelete